Self Editing Part 1
Some of the things we’ve discussed previously are good to be on the watch for and remove, but there are other, specific tasks that can be done when a manuscript’s completed to help polish it. Since there are many of these odd jobs, this specific post will continue over time.
Editing your own work involves hard labor. Other authors have mentioned they make as many as ten to fifteen passes in editing, revising, and reworking, focusing on one or two aspects of self-editing each time. Those authors are to be commended, since writing a book is only one third of the work. Editing is the second third, and publishing and marketing take up the final third. You’re never exactly finished, are you?
-
To review earlier posts, we’ve chatted about removing unnecessary “ly” adverbs, superfluous dialogue tags, inappropriate dialogue tags, redundancies, undue “thats”, and needless directions and impossibilities. It’s hard to imagine there are more chores to be accomplished with self-editing, but there are!
-
Search for weak verbs such as walked, ran, spoke, saw, met, etc., and replace them with stronger, more descriptive verbs. We discussed this somewhat in post #11, “Using a Thesaurus,” and now is the time to haul out your own personal copy and put it to good use. Be careful not to overdo it, though!
-
Search for overused words. This can be hard to do, because you can’t eliminate or reduce the incidence of overused words until you recognize them. With careful study and the use of Microsoft Word’s FIND feature, you may be able to identify those you’re in the habit of using. Some popular writing programs and sites offer help to identify your overworked words. Many of these sites will give you limited information for free, and, of course, a lot more information with a paid subscription. Some programs have a 30-day free trial. You can find others by searching “overused words text analysis.”
-
Grammarly is a popular site with a 30-day free trial.
-
Word and Phrase will analyze short bits of text, but you have to enter your work paragraph by paragraph and keep track of the results.
-
Pro Writing Aid has a brief analysis editor for free, but the limited results don’t seem very useful.
-
Word Counter is free and doesn’t seem to have a limit on text but tends to drop letters (for instance, it listed “edite” as one of my words from this article, instead of “edited”).
- I offer a Text Analysis Program starting at $30, which will give you a good evaluation of your writing, including proper noun inconsistencies, and will also rate your writing against other analyzed manuscripts.
-
Be forewarned: a computerized text analysis program—even mine!—is not as good at finding errors as a human being. But they’re a good start.
-
Vary your sentence constructions. You may notice you tend to write sentences such as “Mark did x, y, and z, and then did a, b, and c.” In suspenseful scenes, you may find, “Tony did x. Frank did y. Tony did z. Then he did a.” Try to vary them, including the length, so the reader doesn’t become bored with the information. Or you may notice you usually write “said <person>.” Try to vary that by changing every other one to “<person> said.” Or move the dialogue tag to the beginning of the dialogue.
Next week we’ll continue with ‘Self-Editing Part 2’.
Susan
Reblogged this on The Owl Lady.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks for reblogging Susan’s great post Viv ❤️
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Viv! Somehow I missed this one. 😦
LikeLike
Reblogged this on K Y R O S M A G I C A and commented:
Chris The Story Reading Ape’s Blog has shared a wonderful Editing 101 series on his blog via Adirondack Editing . Here is no. 13 – Self Editing Part1…
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks for sharing Marje 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Marje! ❤ ❤
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Plaisted Publishing and commented:
Do you Self Edit. Here is Part one for Editing 101
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks for sharing Claire 😀
LikeLike
Thanks a lot, Claire! 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for sharing Malia Ann 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m so enjoying this wonderful, informative series Susan. And I agree with your breakdown of the process; writing could possible less than one third with the amount of time spent on revisions and ongoing marketing. I use Prowriting Aid. I caught a sale on it. Best investment! 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks for the tip, DG! 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Pleasure Susan. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Reblogged this on Don Massenzio's Blog.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks for re-blogging Don 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re welcome
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you, Don! 😀
LikeLiked by 2 people
You’re welcome.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Reblogged this on Kate McClelland.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks for sharing Susan’s post Kate 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
you’re welcome
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thankee kindly, ma’am! (Susan puts on her ten-gallon Texas hat)
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hahahahaha flutters fan in front of face
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hey, don’t knock fans. During that…ahem…time of life, they come in very handy. I keep one in my purse and one on my coffee table… 😀
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hahahaha. I don’t knock them! I have an electric one just trained on me all day when I’m in the office – I feel your pain :0)
LikeLiked by 2 people
Reblogged this on Orthografia.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Ooooo. Thanks for the reblog, but the prefix “ortho” leaves me a little nervous… And that avatar doesn’t help matters! (Susan runs away screaming)
LikeLiked by 2 people
Would you like me to delete the reblog?
LikeLiked by 1 person
No, no! I was being silly! And I honestly thought “ortho” had to do with teeth… You know. like “orthodontia.” But DuckDuckGo says no, it just means straight! So now I know better! 😀
LikeLiked by 2 people
No offense meant on my party, either. WordPress has a ton of trolls and hypersenstive people, so I just delete anything that is a source of a problem. Sorry for missing your humor. For a little more information: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orthography ; obviously I farkled with the spelling a little to produce a unique blog name. Finding good blog names is difficult, particularly since people who are, effectively, cybersquatters grabbed the best names years ago and then did nothing with them, leaving a wasteland of single entry blogs that occupy the more charming possibilities. (It is a source of annoyance for me that I cannot do anything about. Maybe I am a bit sensitive, myself, regarding that particular issue.)
LikeLiked by 2 people
Or is this merely commentary, and not your blog entry?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Definitely just commentary. My apologies for the silliness! Please forgive me!
LikeLiked by 2 people
As an aside, I like your blog. Editor blogs seem hard to find, and they are much needed to catch problems in writing such ranging from the esoteric to the garden variety mis-seplings. Keep up the good werk.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hahahaha! Love your unique spellings! Thanks for the feedback. I’m glad you’re enjoying the series! ❤
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks! Wonder what spiel czech would do with this: “Whan that aprill with his shoures soote”?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Re: “Whan that aprill with his shoures soote” aren’t the kind of errors you should be worried about, because spell check will pick them up and flag them. Mostly their our homonyms that spell cheque doesn’t pic up because they are rite words, just not in the context you’re using them. 😉
LikeLiked by 2 people
Well, I suppose the AI will catch up before long and revoke our collective creative license(s).
LikeLiked by 2 people
It seems to be A Writers’ Blog focused on Mechanics and Marketing Susan – New to me 🐵
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on TINA FRISCO and commented:
In Part 13 of her Editing 101 series on The Story Reading Ape, Susan Uttendorfsky presents Part 1 of self-editing. She discusses searching for weak verbs and overused words, and how to vary sentence constructions. As I’m finalizing my manuscript and preparing to publish my next novel, this series has been extremely helpful. I’m sure you’ll find it helpful as well …
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks for spreading Susan’s post Tina 😀 XXX
LikeLiked by 1 person
Welcome, Chris 🙂 XXX
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hmmmm. (Susan rubs her hands together gleefully) Are you by any chance looking for an editor, Tina? Muwahahahahaha…
(No, Dear Occcasional Reader, I don’t troll people begging for jobs. This is a joke to Tina, who’s a long-time supporter of the Ape’s material—and mine! ❤ )
LikeLiked by 2 people
Good one, Susan! 😊 All kidding aside; if I had the funds, you would be my 1st choice — and I mean that sincerely. Fortunately, I’m a pretty decent editor myself, as is a friend who donated her time in exchange for an autographed copy of the book. This isn’t objective eyes-on — and I’m sure things will be overlooked — but the book will be in good shape when published. Besides, I’ve had your fabulous series here to guide me in many areas where I realized I had strayed — the overuse of ‘that’ being one of them. Thank you again for your generosity ❤
LikeLiked by 2 people
❤ ❤ 😀 😀 ❤ ❤
I am sincerely glad that the series has helped you out in finding your overused thats!
LikeLiked by 2 people
This post is an excellent r.e.m.i.n.d.e.r. 😀 😛
LikeLiked by 2 people
Wait until you read the r.e.m.a.i.n.d.e.r… 😛 (Susan skips away in a silly mood)
LikeLiked by 1 person