These should stir your creative juices ššš
Photograph: Nancy Rica Schiff. Image: Daily Mail (click for more photos)
In 1801, Britainās first census was begun. AĀ subsequent survey, conducted in 1881, asked residents to declare their ārank, profession or occupation.ā Here are some of the more puzzling responses, as preserved by the London Genealogical Society and Jeff Kacirk of Sellers Publishing, Inc:
- Colorist of artificial fish
- Knight of the Thimble
- Disinfector of railways
- Examiner of underclothing
- Invisible net maker
- Electric bath attendant
- Proprietor of midgets
- Fifty-two years an imbecile
- Knocker-up of workpeople
- Maker of sand views
- Gymnast to house painter
- Turnip shepherd
- Emasculator
- Sampler of drugs
- Fatuous pauper
- Drowner
- Fish-bender
- Goldfish-catcher
- Cow-banger
- Running about
- Grape-dryer
- Beef twister
- Random waller
If youāre on the lookout for some more obscure modern-day equivalents, check out this Daily Mail post on Nancy Rica Schiffās photographs of people with odd jobs.
Now, where is a good turnip shepherd when you needā¦
View original post 1 more word
Thanks, Nicholas, and Chris, for this humorous and interesting piece. š — Suzanne
LikeLiked by 1 person
š
LikeLiked by 1 person
First off . . . is “limey” a derogatory term? I’m of Irish descent and don’t mind being called a mick as long as you say it with a smile on your face, stranger. Anyway, I’m gonna use it and if I offend anyone then mea culpa (that’s Latin and don’t get me started on that language. Okay . . . focus, Andrew, focus!).
I beg to differ with my esteemed friends, Nick and Mr. Ape, but Britain’s first census (the Doomsday Book) was is Anno Domini (more Latin!) 1086. Ordered by William the Conqueror. I mean, why conqueror a bunch of limeys if you don’t know how many you’ve conquered? Am I right?
If the damn Normans had just stayed in Merry Old England, all would be well, but in 1167 ol’ Henry ll had to send Richard fitz Godbert de Roche to invade us peace-loving micks. Of all the nerve!!!
I reckon I’m getting a bit off topic here. If I have not offended at least one person, then I’m slipping.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ol’ Willie the Conqueror’s census was of property, not people Andrew, whereas the census Nick mentioned was of people, not property š
BTW, you must be slipping ššš
LikeLiked by 1 person
Didn’t Willie consider you fine folks property? If not then he was slipping. Anyway, I stand corrected.
LikeLiked by 1 person
People were chattels Andrew š
LikeLike
well now… I should think that since I am most visible, whoever it was, had the job of invisible net maker, failed in this case… just sayin
LikeLiked by 1 person
ššš
LikeLiked by 1 person