Emphasizing
Today’s blog post is about using scare quotes and italics for emphasis. As usual, these ways of emphasizing material can be useful and appropriate, but I see writers overdoing their use, which reduces their effectiveness.
What are scare quotes? It’s when you use a double set of quotation marks to set off a word or a phrase in order to emphasize it. Like this:
-
Rebecca just knew he was “the one” for her—the one she would spend the rest of her life with.
If these were the only scare quotes you used in your entire manuscript, nobody would have a problem with it. Well, probably nobody. But once writers start emphasizing words, they usually continue:
-
When Sarah peeked around the corner, she saw that Frank had chosen “that” bottle.
-
The use of “two” limousines seemed ostentatious, even to Paul’s standards.
-
“You know Chevon ‘never’ speaks about his friends,” she said.
And what about the use of italics for emphasis?
-
“How long have <ital>you</ital> been working for him?” she asked archly.
And again, once a writer starts using italics for emphasis, it can quickly become a habit:
-
Once they were up in the airplane, Rocky was surprised to see clouds <ital>below</ital> them.
-
All the food was simply <ital>too much</ital>, even to George!
-
The light glanced off the clean, simple, <ital>expensive</ital> decorator items.
So what’s the problem with emphasizing material in your writing? The problem is, you’re treating your readers as if they’re stupid. If you, the writer, have set up the characters, the storyline, and the scene properly, emphasizing material simply isn’t needed. It’s the typographical equivalent of sticking your elbow in the readers’ ribs and saying, “Pssst! Hey, did you see what I just did there? Didja get it?”
Your job as the writer is to make sure the reader “gets it.” (Unless it’s a mystery, and then you don’t want them to “get it” until you show it to them; in which case, why are you emphasizing anything?) Your readers are smart enough to follow the trail of breadcrumbs you’ve left for them, assuming you did it properly.
Next week we’ll discuss ‘Types of Point of View’
Susan
Oops. Cough. Guilty sometimes. 😦
LikeLiked by 2 people
Shhhhh. We won’t tell.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Ha ha. I’ll buy a big eraser. 😀
LikeLiked by 2 people
I have another type of inquiry, similar to that of Deby Fredericks:
In one of my works, I have interstellar races, the rank they hold and their weapons, all using their terminology. Is it overkill to italicize their words every time they are used, or should it just be the first? Or, not at all? I would really like to get it right.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hi John. Yes, I’m sorry to say that it’s overkill. Ranks in English are not italicized. I assume that these are in a “foreign” language? If that’s the case, then yes, italicize them the first time they’re introduced, but then drop it.
“Where is Zydich Herres?” the commander shouted.
“The zydich is due to arrive shortly,” said Pryvat Smith.
Note that in Chicago Manual of Style, the style guide typically used for fiction, a title is not capped unless it’s used as a title or direct address: President Smith, “Where is the president?” but “I wouldn’t say that, President.” So it would be Zydich Herres, “Where is the zydich?” and “I wouldn’t say that, Zydich.”
🙂
Weapons are not ever italicized in English, but again, if they’re in a foreign language, then yes, at first use only.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Alright. Thank you for the clarification! Now, I need to go back through and fix all that, both the italics and capitols. Oh, boy. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
This makes terrific sense. Thanks for pointing this out. Thankfully, it is one sin I don’t commit as a writer… I just commit zillions of other sins!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hahaha! Our brains can only hold so much knowledge in “active use.” When you learn something new, it seems like something else has to drop out, doesn’t it? 😀
LikeLiked by 2 people
What’s your feeling about italics to indicate a foreign language? Are they “de rigeur?” 😀
LikeLiked by 2 people
If a word can be found in your dictionary of choice (Chicago Manual of Style uses Merriam Webster), then no italics. Their appearance in a respectable English dictionary (not dictionary.com, I’m afraid) means that their use has become part of normal English usage and everyone will know what they mean. So they’re no longer treated as a foreign word.
“De rigueur” is in Merriam Webster, and it adds this information: “De rigueur has been used as an adjective in English for almost two centuries now, which means that it’s established enough to appear in running text without italics.”
LikeLiked by 2 people
Don’t be confused by Merriam Webster’s use of italics in the definition and sample usages. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/de%20rigueur If you use that site to look up another word, like “something,” you’ll see that it is also italicized in the definition and samples. That is simply their style. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
*Quickly opens manuscript and starts deleting italicized words*
LikeLiked by 3 people
Hahaha! Not the actual words, though—just the italics. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
I like throwing in italics from time to time to indicate a change of tone but it is definitely something I wouldn’t want to use too much of. Too much of anything is self explanatory.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Too much of anything can be boring. Don’t give your readers reasons to put the book down! ❤
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, and I must stop saying things twice. That’s putting the point a different way so I’m sure people get it. 😉
LikeLiked by 2 people
Fantastic recognition, Jemima!!! Yes, that’s another habit writers can get into.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Not all writers think their readers are too stupid to get it. Some of us write for readers who have trouble staying tracked on text, despite their intelligence — reading best when their eyes can jump from rock to rock — and sometimes unwilling to read at all when they cannot.
Emphasis throws in some mid-paragraph rocks. Good points otherwise, however.
xx,
mgh
(Madelyn Griffith-Haynie – ADDandSoMuchMORE dot com)
ADD Coach Training Field founder; ADD Coaching co-founder
“It takes a village to educate a world!”
LikeLiked by 4 people
Yes, you’re right. I hadn’t considered writers whose target is a specific group of readers. Thanks for pointing that out!
I didn’t mean to imply that writers truly believe their readers are stupid. It just can look that way when emphasis is overused in writing not meant for a specific audience. 🙂
LikeLiked by 3 people
I knew that. I simply felt compelled to put in a plug for my neurodiverse readers – ALL intelligent (many highly), often made to feel stupid throughout their lives because they struggle staying tracked on endless strings of text with few “rocks.” Of course, the emphasis can’t be gratuitous – which I believe was the point of the post and well taken.
Thanks for understanding.
xx,
mgh
LikeLiked by 3 people
Reblogged this on Smorgasbord – Variety is the spice of life and commented:
Do you “use” too many emphasis tactics in your writing? Susan Uttendorfsky of Adirondack Editing covers the subject today in her Editing 101 over on The Story Reading Ape – “Ace” and #recommended
LikeLiked by 4 people
Many thanks for sharing Sally – Hugs 😀 XXX
LikeLiked by 2 people
Pleasure Chris.. xxx
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Sally! ❤ ❤ ❤
LikeLiked by 2 people
Have a good weekend Susan ♥
LikeLiked by 2 people
Wow what a singling out separating strong post. 🙂 (giggle giggle ) Hugs
LikeLiked by 3 people
Editors love educating essayists, especially when we earn extra encouragement! ❤
LikeLiked by 3 people
Editors and people with a grand grasp of grammar are so badly needed in our society. Especially now that so many of us are writing so much on blogs, self publishing books, and texting all without an education in proper sentence structure and the use of words. I write a lot more now than I ever did before spell check. I never took in depth english classes. So tips and hints written in an easy to understand format is a wonderful gift to people like me. Please keep up the great work. Thanks. Hugs
LikeLiked by 3 people