Homonyms, Homographs, and Homophones
I had a lot of fun researching today’s post. (Yes, I’m an über-geek, but let’s just keep this to ourselves, shall we?) You may be wondering what these words are (and how in the world they pertain to writing), but you’ll be surprised once I define them. I’m sure you know exactly what they are; you just don’t know the official words for them. And we’re only interested in one when it comes to writing and editing.
Homonyms are words with the same spelling and the same pronunciation, but they have different meanings:
-
bear (animal) and bear (tolerate)
-
rose (flower) and rose (past tense of “rise”)
-
spruce up a room and a spruce tree
See? You knew that, right? Let’s go on.
Homographs are words with the same spelling, but different pronunciation and different meanings:
-
desert (to abandon) and desert (an area of land)
-
a bass fish, a bass instrument
-
I wind the clock, the wind blew
You knew them, too! What a smarty you are. Now we’re getting to the one we have to watch out for in writing and editing.
Homophones are words with different spellings but the same pronunciation and different meanings. Some you’re probably very familiar with:
-
bear and bare
-
due and do
-
they’re, their, and there
-
threw and through
-
to, two, and too
-
waist and waste
-
waive and wave
-
whose and who’s
Spell check and other grammar programs will not catch homophones, because the wrong word used in context is actually a proper word. For these errors, you need a real, live human being who can understand the context of your words and pick out when you’ve used the wrong one. Either a copy editor, a beta reader, or a helpful reading friend can be useful in finding these. Some others, which can be very tricky and hard to spot, are as follows (the asterisked ones I see frequently):
-
break and brake*
-
chow and ciao*
-
firs and furs*
-
fore, four, and for*
-
led and lead*
-
leech and leach*
-
peak, peek, and pique*
-
poor, pour, and pore*
-
racked and wracked*
-
road, rode, and rowed*
-
weak and week*
-
wreak and reek*
-
yolk and yoke*
-
your, you’re, and yore*
-
aisle, I’ll, and isle
-
bore, boor, and boar
-
carat, caret, carrot, and karat
-
creak and creek
-
flower and flour
-
forward and foreword (not in most British accents)
-
libel and liable
-
our, hour, and are
-
plain and plane
-
racket, raquette, and rackett
-
sun and son
-
wade and weighed
-
wait and weight
-
wale, wail, and whale
-
which and witch
Most homonyms occur in pairs, as you can see in the lists above. Some are triples and are called “multinyms.” A list of them can be found HERE (if your geeky curiosity equals mine)
Wikipedia says that in English, there are approximately 88 triples; 24 quadruples; two quintuples; one sextet and one septet. The septet is:
-
Raise, rays, rase, raze, rehs, réis, res
Other than the three common words (raise, rays, and raze), there are:
-
rase – a verb meaning “to erase”;
-
rehs – the plural of reh, a mixture of sodium salts found as an efflorescence in India;
-
réis – the plural of real, a currency unit of Portugal and Brazil; and
-
res – the plural of re, a name for one step of the musical scale.
Next week we’ll discuss ‘Powerful Protagonists’
Susan
Reblogged this on Plaisted Publishing and commented:
The same word spelt different and with a different meaning. The two i tend to get wrong are Being & Been as well as There & Their…
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks for re-blogging Claire 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank ewe so much, Claire! I’ve being their. 😉
LikeLiked by 2 people
LOL 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Reblogged this on Don Massenzio's Blog.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hear you our rite on schedule, Don! Thank ewe! 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks for re-blogging Don 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re welcome
LikeLiked by 2 people
Love your posts! Does that make a geek–if so, so be it!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, Rae! “Sew bee it,” it is! 😉
LikeLiked by 2 people
Clever, clever girl!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hahaha! It’s harder than ewe think too search your brain for homophones to replace words with! 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
As I’m dyslexic I’m a terrible speller – I’m also a terrible geek but couldn’t indulge in my geekiness because the link doesn’t work for me. One of my bugbears (annoyance not hobgoblin) is currant and current. And what do you call words where you’ve got all the letters right but in the wrong order? I don’t mean a typo because I do it by hand as well – seem to have a fixation at the moment of writing how when I mean who!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, currant/current trip people up, too! Lately I’ve seen a lot of bizarre/bazaar. Thanks four letting me no about the link. The Internet found it on the Wayback machine, here: https://web.archive.org/web/20131012020748/http://people.sc.fsu.edu/~jburkardt/fun/wordplay/multinyms.html
Chris, can ewe please update the link? 😉
I don’t no what ewe call it when the correct letters our their but in the wrong order (you must hate me, Lindsey, for these comments!). Let me go look. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Done Susan – Sorry, I thought I’d rechecked this link, but must have missed it 😳
LikeLiked by 1 person
No problem! You might’ve and it only recently became a 404 error. Luckily the Wayback Machine came to the rescue! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Phew (or should that be Few, or Feuw, or…)😈
LikeLiked by 1 person
Only had a quick glance – I’m battling the flu (not flue) – so am off to bed with a hot drink in a minute, but looks a great list, will study later. Many thanks. And how on earth could I hate someone as helpful as you? Love what you do and know I’m not alone. :).
Oh, and I don’t mean anagram as that is a deliberate rearrangement!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Without deeper research, it seems that typing the correct letters but in the wrong order (something that I do frequently, too) is a “mild form of dycalculia. It appears [to be when someone is] weak in sequencing, while conceptual/holistic/right brain processing is strong and so are attentional skills” The information (not professional) also said, “it is common for students with dyscalculia to be accelerated in verbal skills and language, science (up to the point where it requires lots of math) and the arts.”
Or it may be just that our brains get ahead of our fingers. 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sorry your reply wasn’t showing when I put my response. As well as dyslexic I’m dyscalculic which is to do with numbers – so perhaps it is just another dyslexic trait.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Eye hope your flue gets better very sewn! (That last word may be a homophone dependent on accent…) Take care of yourself. ❤
LikeLiked by 1 person
Love these posts and your humor, Susan. 😀
LikeLiked by 2 people
Eye appreciate it as always, Tess! 😉
LikeLiked by 2 people
😀 😀 😀
LikeLiked by 2 people
Reblogged this on TINA FRISCO and commented:
Susan Uttendorfsky brings us Part 16 of her Editing 101 series on The Story Reading Ape. She discusses homonyms, homographs, and homophones, the latter of which can be a challenge to writers …
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thanks for reblogging Tina ❤❤❤
LikeLiked by 1 person
Welcome, Chris ❤❤❤
LikeLiked by 1 person
Tina, your sew prompt and thorough! (((((((((hugs)))))))))) 😉
LikeLiked by 2 people
Susan, ewe must bee a hoot at parties 🙂 Hugs back at ya! ❤
LikeLiked by 2 people
Maybe, Tina, butt I rarely attend such shenanigans. Playing with words on the computer is moar fun. 😀
LikeLiked by 2 people
Okay, I can’t top that one right now. Too tired from all the “newly published” shenanigans. But you can be dang sure my subconscious will be working on it for several more days to come! 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Reblogged this on Writing for the Whole Darn Universe.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, Malia! I no the hole darn universe will love it. 😉
LikeLiked by 2 people
You’re welcome, Susan! Even ETs need excellent grammar. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Definitely! And wee all no English can be tough too learn. 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am enjoying your series.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m sew glad, M. Thanks for coming to reed and comment. 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Its always good to have a refresher on some of these things.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Your welcome! It can bee hard to weight when you’re book is finished and ewe want to get it published, butt it’s really better to weight until it’s just rite! 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Siefken Publications.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank ewe, Wendy and Charles! And thanks four you’re connection requests in the passed few days. 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person